Skip to main content

Fixed deposit v/s Recurring deposit

Fixed deposit v/s Recurring deposit - Which is better? 

The attraction for a fixed deposit and a recurring deposit is the fixed returns with safety of money invested. 
But when you compare the two, a fixed deposit scores higher than a recurring deposit. 

The attraction for both these instruments is the fixed returns with safety of money invested. But when you compare the two, a fixed deposit scores higher than a recurring deposit. 

Let’s see how these two products differ in the earnings and when you should opt for them- 

Features Both FD and RD are fixed income products available from banks. On the invested amount banks pay you a fixed interest which can be at a specific frequency till the term or on maturity. At the end of the term, the maturity amount which is your invested capital, along with remaining or accumulated interest is paid. Although the interest of banking products change with interest rates scenario, in both these products once you have invested the interest rate remains same throughout the term. In recent times the high rising rates have prompted banks to offer high interest rates on these two instruments and so the attraction of investors has increased manifold. 

Taxability Both these products have the same taxability. The interest received from these two is is added to your total income and taxed at your personal income tax rate. So if you are in 30% tax slab, the interest from FD & RD will be taxed at the same rate. 

However, there is a difference in the nature of tax deduction. In a fixed deposit, banks deduct TDS if the interest income in a year exceeds Rs 10000 but there is no TDS deduction in recurring deposit. This one feature sways investors’ interest towards RD when there is a comparison. Where you earn more? When you compare both these products, a fixed deposit fetches you more income than a recurring deposit. Lets’ assume you have invested Rs 24000 in a fixed deposit at start of the year and Rs 2000 p.m. in a recurring deposit for a year. Both these products offer you a 9% rate of interest compounded quarterly. This is what you will earn from these two instruments:   Fixed Deposit Recurring Deposit Invested Amount (Rs) 24000 2000 p.m. Interest Rate (p.a.) 9% compounded quarterly 9% compounded quarterly Total Interest earned in a  year (Rs) 2234 1195 Total Amount after One Year (Rs) 26324 25195 Difference (Rs) 1039           

As you can see, after a year you will receive Rs 26324 in a fixed deposit while in RD you will receive Rs 25195. So the recurring deposit earns you Rs 1039 less than a fixed deposit.. The primary reason for this difference is that in FD you invest a lumpsum amount and so the entire money earns interest for one year. But in a recurring deposit the first installment earns interest for 12 months period, the second for 11 months, third for 10 months and so on. Due to this variation FD is able to fetch a higher maturity. 

When to Invest in FD & RD? Although FD earn higher than RD, it’s not feasible for a single product to meet all your needs. When you do not have a lumpsum to invest but can save a defined amount from your income every month, a recurring deposit is a more viable product. With it you can achieve an objective of regular savings for your medium term needs. But when you have a lumpsum to invest then FD is a wiser choice. Although both these banking products appeal to all class of investors, it is more lucrative for small investors who are mostly in lower tax slab. The less or non-taxability of interest along with high interest payout in today’s scenario ensures a good fixed earnings for their goals. Avail them as they will help in meeting certain objectives but do take all associated factors into consideration.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TOP 10 VENOMOUS SNAKES IN THE WORLD

            It’s important to point out here that there’s a difference between   venomous snakes   and   poisonous snakes . Venomous here implies that something is capable of injecting someone or something with Venom, while poisonous implies that it is capable of harming you by merely touching or eating it.    Now let see the rating from 10th to 1st place -  10. Rattle Snake         The Rattle Snake is a sub-family of the pit vipers, it has a very unique tail that makes it easy to be identified. At the end of it’s tail is located the rattle which makes so much noise when shaken, that’s where the name “rattle snake” comes from. Large number of it can be found in America particularly at the south, western part of United States and Mexico. One Striking feature of rattle snake that they possessed from the pit vipers families is that they have two organs that...
Alexander Graham Bell, the teacher of the deaf and his deaf wife Alexander Graham Bell. Alexander Graham Bell  (3 March 1847 – 2 August 1922) was an eminent scientist, inventor and innovator who is widely credited with inventing the first practical telephone. Bell was deeply affected by his mother's gradual deafness, (she began to lose her hearing when he was 12) and learned a manual finger language so he could sit at her side and tap out silently the conversations swirling around the family parlour. He also developed a technique of speaking in clear, modulated tones directly into his mother's forehead wherein she would hear him with reasonable clarity. Bell's preoccupation with his mother's deafness led him to study Acoustics (study of all mechanical waves in gases, liquids, and solids including vibration, sound, ultrasound and infrasound). Alexander Graham Bell, his wife Mabel Gardiner Hubbard, and their daughters Elsie (left) an...

ORA-30013: undo tablespace 'UNDOTBS1' is currently in use

ORA-30013 is the error reported when the specified Undo tablespace is in use. In other words, this implies there are some background processes still using the undo tablespace.   This error can be reported in both space management or transaction management.   Error ORA-30013 reported while dropping the Undo tablespace.   In this case, the Undo tablespace is used by other active transactions, leading to the error. In such cases, we have to wait until the transactions are committed or rolled back before dropping the Undo tablespace. This situation is similar to that of the ORA-1548 case. Error ORA-30013 reported while bringing up the database.   This happens for RAC databases while the undo tablespace mentioned for an instance is already in use. The solution will be to set separate Undo tablespace for all instances.   Since undo_tablespace is an instance local parameter, we have to ensure that the "Alter system set undo_tablespace" is being invo...